Understanding Needs and Wants

“But Mom!” the teenager wailed, “I need this. All my friends have ’em, and I don’t. It’s not fair.”
“Sweetie,” Mom replied, “I understand you’re upset. What you’re feeling is your need to belong and have friends. It’s natural. We’re a social species.”
The teenager pursed her lips. “Mom, please, no lectures, not now. I need this. I really, really do.”
“What you need is to have friends, to belong—belongingness. What you want is to have this thing, to show your friends that you and they share values, that you’re one of them, that you belong.”
The daughter stared into her lap and her shoulders heaved.
“Dear,” Mom said quietly. Her daughter looked up. “Go ask your father.”
As she slid from her kitchen stool, a tear-streaked smile spread across the girl’s face. “I love you, Mom.”

Needs and wants are related. Both address a pull, a desire for or to something, and good product developers recognize the differences—for startups working to launch their first products, understanding the distinctions is critical.

Maslow's hierarchy of needs

A need is a necessity, an urge, a fundamental requirement we feel to satisfy our general well-being and our instinct for self-preservation. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs (diagram) presents this well. In the scene above, the daughter feels the psychological need to belong, have intimate relationships, and have friends.

A want, however, is a desire to have or do something. It’s a wish for something. The daughter feels her need for friends, and her strategy is to be someone who’s liked—the hypothesis being that people who are liked have friends. Her tactic, her solution, her want, therefore, is to have what her friends have . . . be it a popular phone, a brand of shoes, piercings, etc., signaling she values the same things as her friends, that she’s one of them, and that she belongs.

The need is the necessity, the want is the solution. (For the product to be a solution, it must be known to customers, which is why companies advertise.) If the image of crying teenagers is not to your taste, try, “I need food, and I want pizza.” Food is the need, and pizza is the solution, the want. Or think of the enthusiast who exclaims, “Wow, this is cool. I can do a lot with this. I want one.” He looks up. “Where can I buy it?”—indeed every startup’s dream.

The Number One Rule for Startups and Product Developers, Generally

As founders, marketers, and product developers, we must understand that every need has existed since time began; our job is to understand these needs and commercialize better solutions—be they goods like new kitchen appliances or services like new amusement parks.

Reflecting on this rule helps us understand three things:

  1. Because humans have always addressed their needs somehow, every new product, and startup, has competitors. A new product (i.e., solution) competes, favorably or not, against every existing, available, alternative solution. We need to understand how our product, or solution, compares favorably and unfavorably to all competitive solutions.
  2. Humans resist change. Research shows that for customers to change their habits, a new solution should be at least thirty percent better than its competition—hopefully, lower prices isn’t where the team will hang its hat. For example, in commercial markets, electric bicycles are replacing traditional, pedal-only ones; so, thinking from customers’ and users’ points of view, list, value, and rank the benefits (good and bad) they perceive as they move to electric bikes. On the plus side, electric bikes suggest less effort, faster speeds, and some techno-cool ego satisfaction. On the minus side, there might be concerns with range, charging, weight, safety, and high prices. It seems electric bikes have achieved the thirty percent threshold.

Are there exceptions to this thirty percent requirement? If yes, they’ll prove the rule. Staying with bicycles, think competitive racing, where victories are measured in fractions of a second. A solution that cuts a second from a cyclist’s time is a huge advantage. But what is the net sum of the costs and benefits? From the user’s and customer’s point of view, will this new technology achieve the thirty percent threshold? “One second is amazing,” the team coach says, “but will our regulations allow this? Is it safe? Is it durable? Reliable?” Lastly, the coach asks about pricing. The key question for the startup is: will enough coaches, or their buyers, buy enough units fast enough at the target price before the startup spends all its money? I hope so.

  1. Finally, reasonable and prompt input from many sources is essential, but quality input from users and customers is crucial. Therefore, we should constantly seek out, speak with, and listen carefully to potential, existing, and former customers, all while keeping an eye on our competitors and suppliers. True, not all customers or suppliers are always correct, and you don’t have to accept everything you learn. Still, you must be receptive and open-minded, constantly tracking your data, and willing to change course as you work to understand customers’ needs and wants.

Stay tuned, next week I’ll tackle the three key marketing questions. So, let’s end with this adage: “There are those who lead, those who follow, and those who wonder what just happened.”

Colorado Technology Ventures coaches and mentors founders and startups.

Back to Top

Home

Scrub These Words to Help You Get Funded

Here comes spring and spring means funding. Colorado’s OEDIT launched its spring grant cycle, and schools like the University of Colorado–Boulder (New Venture Challenge) and the University of California–Davis (Big Bang!) are celebrating their new venture competitions. Founders and teams, scrub these words to help you get funded.

Founders and their teams are practicing their presentations and submitting their materials, hoping to win prizes and meet investors. I am or have been a coach, mentor, reviewer, or panel judge in all three of these programs, and I urge founders and teams to take these steps to get funded:

Avoid adjectives. Avoid adverbs. Avoid pronouns. At least, use them very judiciously. (Ha. See what I did there?)

Here’s why.

  1. Adjectives and adverbs can limit your opportunities. I worked with a team developing a lawn-care product. Their target customers were people who own residential homes. I asked why they were limiting their market to residential homeowners. How about renters or people with vacation cabins? How about targeting people with lawns? Don’t limit yourself unnecessarily—avoid adjectives and adverbs.
  2. Adjectives and adverbs invite hyperbole. Judges and investors ignore hyperbole and sometimes question a founder’s judgment, discipline, or honesty. Judges and investors have too often read or heard, “We have no competition, and we will fundamentally and completely revolutionize this unlimited, global market.” Resist hyperbole—avoid adjectives and adverbs.
  3. The use of pronouns can be confusing. Listen to founders describe their business; chances are, their use of pronouns will soon confuse their audience. Imagine a busy investor who interrupts saying, “Wait, you said we need x, but who again is we? Do you mean we as in users, we as in customers, or we as in your team? Sorry, but I’m confused. Hey, anyway, I need to go.” Don’t confuse—avoid pronouns.
  4. Unbridled use of adverbs, adjectives, and pronouns can suggest that you’re nervous, don’t know your material, or careless in your work. Investors are more interested in people who speak confidently and succinctly. Be strong, direct, and confident—use adverbs, adjectives, and pronouns sparingly.
  5. Finally, judges and investors are inundated with information. Most adverbs and adjectives are unnecessary, and sloppy use of pronouns can be confusing. Improve your chance of success by caring about other people’s time and attention—use adjectives, adverbs, and pronouns carefully.

For a bonus, you can also improve your work by submitting it to one or more online word-cloud analyzers. Seeing how often you use certain words will be surprising. Lastly, there’s no avoiding editing. Writers know a piece is never done, it’s just due.

Colorado Technology Ventures, LLC, coaches and mentors founders and their teams. Please visit CTV’s website to learn how it can help you and your teams succeed.

Go to Colorado Technology Ventures.

A Useful Decision Table Template

Click the following link to open a pdf copy of a useful decision table template. This table will help you organize your thoughts and rank alternatives for your consideration. You might use this to help decide which market to declare as your beachhead market, which product features to include at launch, which candidate to hire, and more.

Click here for your pdf copy of the template. You may also contact CTV for an MS Excel copy of this template.

This template is free to use, but please recognize CTV.

Back to Top

Home

Scrub Out These Fallacies!


Scrub Out These Fallacies! Have you ever heard an argument that sounds confusing, twisted, maybe misleading, or just plain wrong? Perhaps you’ve listened to an argument that contains assumptions or definitions you don’t, or don’t yet, accept. And perhaps you’ve unwittingly made such arguments yourself, but you can’t quite explain why your argument fails or sounds off or wrong.

The following presents some twenty-plus fallacies one might encounter in arguments. Use this list to help you better understand arguments and to help you scrub these fallacies from your value propositions, elevator pitches, pitch decks, business plans, etc. Your teams and investors will thank you.

Fallacies

Adapted by Eben Johnson from Logic by Stan Baronett, Oxford Press, 2016; logiccheck.ai (viewed 17 February 2025); and philosophy.lander.edu (viewed 17 February 2025). The Latin translations are from A Dictionary of Latin Words and Phrases by James Morwood; Oxford Press; 1998.

Formal fallacies are logical errors that occur in the form or structure of an argument and are restricted to deductive arguments.

Informal fallacies are mistakes in reasoning that occur in ordinary language and are different from errors in the form or structure of arguments, as found in some deductive arguments.

Deductive arguments are arguments in which, assuming the premises to be true, it is impossible for the conclusion to be false; if yes and yes, then the argument is valid and sound. “A equals B, and B equals C. Therefore, A equals C.”

Inductive arguments are arguments in which, assuming the premises are true, it is improbable that the conclusion is false; if yes and yes, then the argument is strong and cogent. “I’m told this jar contains one blue marble and ninety-nine red ones. Therefore and assuming my information is correct, if I reach in and draw out one marble, I’m likely to draw a red one.”

A loose mnemonic to help remember deductive versus inductive arguments is to think deductive arguments use data and inductive ones use insight—“d” for data and deductive and “i” for insight and inductive.

Personal Attacks

  1. Ad Hominem (L., lit., to the individual man) abusive: An attack on alleged character flaws of a person instead of the person’s argument. “Don’t listen to him. He does drugs.”
  2. Ad Hominem (L., lit., to the individual man) circumstantial: When a person’s argument is rejected based on the person’s life circumstances. “His opinions have no merit—his party lost the election.”
  3. Poisoning the well: When a person is attacked before presenting their case. “We shouldn’t let her speak. She spent a year in jail.”
  4. Tu Quoque (L., lit., you too, you’re another): When one person seeks to avoid the issue by claiming the other is a hypocrite. “You say I should not do drugs, but you did drugs.”

Emotional Appeals

  1. Appeal to fear or force: A threat of harmful consequences used to force acceptance of a course of action that would otherwise be unacceptable. “If the workers do not accept a wage cut, the company may close its doors. Thus, the workers should accept a wage cut.”
  2. Appeal to nature: When an argument assumes that something natural is therefore beneficial, correct, good, right, or valid; conversely, something unnatural is not beneficial, correct, good, right, or valid. This fallacy derives from the assumption that nature, or what happens in nature, is superior to all unnatural things. “Raw food is natural food; therefore, we should not eat cooked food.”
  3. Appeal to the people: When an argument manipulates a psychological need or desire so that a reader or listener will accept the conclusion. “We shouldn’t accept illegal aliens. They broke the law entering our country, so we should not let them murder our children.”
  4. Appeal to pity: When an argument relies exclusively on a sense of pity, compassion, or mercy to support a conclusion. “We shouldn’t jail this child. After all, he’s an orphan.”

Weak Inductive Argument Fallacies

  1. Biased sample: Use of a non-representative biased sample to support a statistical claim about an entire population. “A sample of one thousand religious people suggested 85% of them believe X is wrong. Therefore, 85% of all Americans believe X is wrong.”
  2. Composition: 1) The mistaken transfer of an attribute of the individual parts of an object to the object as a whole. “His body cells are small. Therefore, he must be small.” 2) The mistaken transfer of an attribute of the individual members of a class to the class itself. “A motorcycle is noisier than a car. Therefore, motorcycles contribute more to noise than cars.”
  3. Division: 1) The mistaken transfer of an attribute of the object as a whole to individual parts of an object. “The elephant is big. Thus, the elephant must have big cells.” 2) The mistaken transfer of an attribute of a class to individual members of the class. “That is a wooden chair. Thus, its legs must be made of wood.”
  4. Hasty generalization: A generalization built on a few instances. “I saw a red car speeding. Probably all drivers of red cars speed.”
  5. Post Hoc (L., lit., after this): The mistaken assumption that just because one event occurred before another event, the first event must have caused the second event. (The complete Latin phrase is “post hoc, ergo propter hoc,” meaning “after this, therefore on account of this.”) “I felt sick after eating at that restaurant. Therefore, that restaurant’s food is bad.”
  6. Rigid application of a generalization: When a generalization or rule is inappropriately applied to the case at hand (it has no exceptions). “Even though the man rescued a child in danger, I can’t believe the police didn’t arrest him for trespassing.”
  7. Slippery slope: An attempt to connect a series of occurrences such that the first link in a chain leads directly to a second link, and so on, until a final unwarranted situation is said to be the inevitable result. “If you smoke pot, then you’ll shoot heroin, and then you’ll soon murder people.”

Fallacies of unwarranted assumptions are arguments that assume the truth of some unproven or questionable claim.

  1. Appeal to ignorance: An argument built on a position of ignorance. 1) A statement must be true because it has not been proven false. “There’s life beyond Earth because no one has proven there isn’t.” 2) A statement must be false because it has not been proven to be true. “There’s no life beyond Earth because we haven’t received a signal.”
  2. Appeal to popular belief: An argument built on the premise that if most people believe something to be true, it must be so. “A great number of Americans believe communism is bad, so it must be true.”
  3. Appeal to tradition: An argument built on the premise that something is good or true because it’s always been done so. “This political party is a good party because our family has always voted for it.”
  4. Appeal to an unqualified authority: An argument that relies on the opinions of people with no expertise, training, or knowledge of the relevant issue or whose testimony is untrustworthy. “I’m an actor on TV, and what’s going on in country X is wrong.”
  5. Begging the question: 1) When a premise is simply reworded in the conclusion. “Pavarotti is the best singer, so no one is better than Pavarotti.” 2) Circular reasoning: A set of statements that seem to support each other with no clear beginning or end. “He never lies, and because he always tells the truth, you should believe him.” 3) The argument contains certain key information that may be controversial or is not supported by the facts. “Murder is always wrong. Therefore, abortion is always wrong.”
  6. Complex question: When a single question actually contains multiple parts and an unestablished hidden assumption. “Do you still cheat on your taxes?”
  7. Fallacy of accident: When a commonly accepted generalization is improperly used to infer a specific case. “By law, all children must attend school. Your child, although ill, must attend school.”
  8. False dichotomy: When it is assumed only two choices are possible when, in fact, other options exist. “We either give up basic freedoms, or we lose the war.”

Fallacies of diversion are when the meaning of terms or phrases is changed within the argument or when our attention is purposely or accidentally diverted from the issue at hand.

  1. Equivocation: When the conclusion of an argument relies on a shift in the meaning of a term or phrase in the premises. “He’s an idiot. Since idiots should be kept in hospitals, he should be in a hospital.” Or, when a politician says, “The fact of the matter is . . .” but states an opinion rather than a fact. “The fact of the matter is criminals should be in jail.”
  2. Missing the point: When premises that seem to lead logically to one conclusion are used instead to support an unexpected conclusion. “It may take years to solve a crime. Therefore, our police should have the same equipment as our military.”
  3. Misleading precision: A claim that appears statistically significant but is not. “Our desert foods contain 30% less fat than our competitor’s, so you should eat our deserts to lose weight.”
  4. Red herring: When a person completely ignores an opponent’s position and changes the subject, diverting the discussion in a new direction. “She says, ‘Abusive use of social media has hurt some children,’ and he replies, ‘How can we criticize the use of the internet when it enables families to stay in touch and people to purchase airplane tickets?’”
  5. Straw man: When an argument is misrepresented to create a new argument that can be refuted easily. “He says, ‘Intelligent design shouldn’t be taught in science classes,’ and she replies, ‘He’s against teaching intelligent design, but he’s really trying to end religious freedom in our country.’”

Finally, a helpful recommendation: If you and your interlocutor or interlocutors are arguing and seem to be at an impasse, then pause, step back, and together review and address each of your definitions and enthymemes (loosely, unstated premises). You might discover that your impasse is based on having differing and unstated assumptions, definitions, beliefs, etc. “Oh, wow, I thought x meant y. My mistake.” Or, “Yes, of course, I accept exceptions—I just didn’t think it mattered or that I needed to say so. It’s just that . . .” Try it. You’ll be surprised to find you have more in common with others than you first thought.

Back to Top

Home

Simplify and Present Your Market Size Analysis

Much has been said about the size of your Total Addressable Market (TAM). However, it’s easy to get confused and overly complicated. For example, one might ask, “Is my TAM at launch, a few years after launch, once we’ve gone international, or added new products?” I use a simple modification to TAM. I add, “At Launch”, or “+3 years”. It renders as “TAMAL” and “TAM+3”.  Thus, at launch, when we have one to a few new products, haven’t added features to win a larger market, haven’t gone overseas, etc., we can easily remember and say that our TAMAL, our Total Addressable Market at Launch, is X units and/or Y dollars. Click here for an example of a TAM analysis as presented in a slide deck. Try it. It’s easy to present and easier to estimate.

Back to Top

Home

Know Your Customers

Know your customers. Knowing your target market, down to an accurate description of the archetype customer, is critical to your business. It helps you develop your products, advertise well, and sell successfully. Known as developing your customer persona, you and your team should describe your target customer in such great detail that you can spot this person at a distance with nothing more than a glance.

Here’s a write-up shared by one of Eben’s former students:


“I attended our No Name Bar pizza night after the last class of EMEN5090 this semester. I was a distance student, so had never met anyone in class before (including Professor Eben Johnson). I remember him saying in class that he could guess the car that people drive. Having never met him before and being pretty confident that he could not guess the type of car I drive, I told him that I was hoping he would try to guess my car.

He started off by asking me a few questions: Where do I work and how long have I worked there, what is my job title there, what do I like to do for fun, do I have any kids or dogs or roommates, etc. I answered those questions and he quickly started to narrow it down. He knew right away it wasn’t an SUV, that it had a leather interior (no idea how), that it was not American-made, and then he even guessed my boyfriend’s car right away after talking about him for just a minute (even down to the detail of the Jeep having a winch on the front). He thought about a Prius but quickly moved away from that (without me saying a word). He asked a few more questions and then said, “It’s not a BMW 5 series. I’m thinking it’s a BMW 3 series . . .” So far all he knew was I like volleyball and taekwondo, I have worked at Lockheed Martin as a systems engineer for 7 years, I have a boyfriend with a Jeep, and I have no pets or kids. There were a few other people there trying to guess, and no one even came close. He continued to come up with details on the car, such as dark blue exterior, sedan, etc.

Before I left, he made his final guess of a “Dark blue BMW 3 series, black leather interior, and the dealership name around the back license plate.” I couldn’t believe it. Sure enough, I drive a dark blue BMW 3 series! I don’t think I seem like the kind of person to drive a BMW. In fact, the reasons I bought it aren’t for the name or the luxury or anything anyone normally thinks of. It’s all-wheel drive, the back seats lay down (harder to find than you would think), it can get up to speed on the highway quickly, gets good gas mileage, and it’s quiet. I was in shock. By this point, everyone was listening, and I admitted that he got it exactly right . . . except for the interior color. I thought my interior was tan, and I honestly didn’t know if my back license plate had the dealership’s name framed around it.

I got back to my car (parked a few blocks away, so there was no cheating there), and the first thing I did was look at the back license plate. Sure enough, Ralph Schomp BMW is framed around it. I then got inside and immediately felt extremely stupid . . . My interior is black!!! It was the only detail I thought he had wrong, and he even knew better than I did! I had a rental car for a few days before that and the interior of that car was tan, so that’s my excuse for thinking it was tan (in addition to the fact that it was my final week of grad school!). I felt ridiculous, but it wouldn’t have been fair to let Eben keep thinking that he got the interior wrong, so I sent him an email that night letting him know that he nailed it, down to the detail (even details I didn’t remember).

It was really incredible! I still have no idea how he could’ve possibly guessed that with the information that he had and this being the first time I met him. I had to share this story to say just how impressed I was . . .  I didn’t believe it, but I do now. Try him out :)”

Back to Top

Home

Three Simple Rules for Inventory Management

Rules for inventory management. While one can easily devote a career to management of inventory, here are five simple rules that will help any operation:

    • Avoid intelligent part number systems – they get complicated quickly and hard to maintain; one exception is to let R&D have separate part numbers, often identified with an “X” prefix, where these development parts are kept separate from, and not required to meet the standards of, production parts
    • Label, stamp, or mark parts with part number and revision levels (in the case of processes involving bulks such as liquids, make sure the containers are similarly marked)
    • Prioritize and control direct material by levels of importance – an ABC system; “A” parts may be expensive and/or long lead-time parts; “B” parts are somewhere in the middle, and; “C” parts are cheap and plentiful, such as simple fasteners
    • Control your inventory counts, especially for “A” parts, likely for “B” parts, and less importantly for “C” parts
    • Never store indistinguishable parts near each other – if one can’t tell this part has been hardened and this one not, then store them at least 3m apart from each other

The key is to have a system that delights your customers in terms of price, quality, and delivery, that is flexible, and that people are willing to use consistently.

Back to Top

Home